Q

So what exactly is tantric sex? What is tantra?

A

Tantra as it is seen in the West is very different from the original ways it was practiced. It is essentially a tradition in which awakening is pursued through embodiment (vs. disembodiment in meditation, etc.) and union is sought through relationship and intimacy. In the West it has been mostly pursued for its emphasis on using sexual union as one of the vehicles to awakening (enlightenment). In reality, only a small portion of tantra has anything to do with sex, and only as a way to merge with the divine. There is a much larger tantric discipline that deals with allowing all feelings to be met with equal acceptance, and for each person to become deeply sensitive to what they are feeling. Subsequently, they are then able to feel others and their needs.

“IN REALITY ONLY A SMALL PORTION OF TANTRA HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH SEX, AND ONLY AS A WAY TO MERGE WITH THE DIVINE.”

Q

How do you work with clients? Is there touching?

A

Sessions are individualized depending on what the person or couple needs. These days I mostly teach groups. Both in sessions and workshops there is no sexually explicit touching, no nudity and strict rules to ensure safety and maximum freedom in applying the techniques used. All the practices I teach are energetic in nature and can be done fully clothed. In personal sessions I might give the couple homework and assignments. In workshops I teach how to create intimacy and how to revive or increase sexual chemistry.

Q

Do people come to you to experience more pleasure? Or do they come to you because they’re not experiencing any pleasure at all?

A

Both. Some people have traumatic, habitual, societal or other closures in their body that prevent them from experiencing pleasure. Some people just have not experienced pleasure yet. Some people want to enhance the intimacy, connection, and pleasure they have.

Q

What’s the disconnect? Why the lack of intimacy?

A

We are educated in most areas of our life, but there is no real sexual/relational/intimate education. We mostly see what our parents do and then fumble through our first few relationships. Many people have had a lack of intimacy in their upbringing and no sexual/sensual education as they started relationships. Life these days is increasingly disconnected and often the emphasis in relationships is on making money or raising kids—intimacy only becomes a goal when the relationship already suffers.

“LIFE THESE DAYS IS INCREASINGLY DISCONNECTED AND OFTEN THE EMPHASIS IN RELATIONSHIPS IS ON MAKING MONEY OR RAISING KIDS—INTIMACY ONLY BECOMES A GOAL WHEN THE RELATIONSHIP ALREADY SUFFERS.”

Q

Can you explain the masculine and feminine aspects, and how this becomes distorted as we age as a couple?

A

Each human has both masculine and feminine in them. We usually tend to enjoy one aspect more than the other—that’s what is called the essence.

The feminine in men and women alike enjoys the flow of life and love, revels in the ability to enjoy beauty, nature, textures, colors, and experiences. Fullness is the feminine principle. Sexually speaking, the partner with a feminine essence enjoys the aspects of surrender, dissolution, and being ravished.

The masculine in men and women alike enjoys the forward motion of directed action and purpose. A time/space grid of linear planning and thinking feels enjoyable to the masculine. The masculine principle is emptiness. Through meditation, watching sports, competition, having a drink, “zoning out” in front of a TV, and relaxation through sex are activities the masculine in a person enjoys.

“IN LONG TERM RELATIONSHIPS PARTNERS OFTEN BECOME VERY MUCH THE SAME—WE START TO LIKE THE SAME THINGS, DO THE SAME THINGS—OVER TIME, THE COUPLE RESONATES RATHER THAN POLARIZES AND HENCE HAS LESS SEXUAL CHEMISTRY.”

Men and women have both traits, but in a polarized (meaning sexually oriented) relationship one partner takes on the feminine expression and one takes on the more masculine expression and the radical differences in orientation create a strong arc of sexual polarity. The further the “poles” are apart, the stronger the sexual attraction.

In long term relationships, partners often become very much the same—we start to like the same things, do the same things—over time, the couple resonates rather than polarizes and hence has less sexual chemistry.

Q

How do you re-establish the polarity when it’s gone? How do you create sexual chemistry?

A

Gender has very little to do with polarity practices. The only important thing is that one partner animates one end of the spectrum, while the other partner goes as far to the other end as possible for the sake of the strong arc of polarity. Polarity works like physics, with easily applicable rules that can produce polarity almost instantly. (In workshops I can teach these techniques and even strangers can effortlessly produce polarity). It’s much easier producing polarity than it is to find a compatible loving relationship.

Here are a couple of examples that I encounter frequently—keep in mind that there is no issue if you and your partner want to be friends. But if you’d like to have sex, then it’s important to be conscious of creating sexual tension when you are planning on a romantic evening. While for simplicity, I’m describing a hetero couple, these same principles apply to any gender combination.

SETTING THE SCENE

More and more women these days work out of the home—and as a matter of course, they spend their days in the masculine aspect, making decisions and directing others. In fact, the first thing many women may want to do after work is to get “full” again, to get back into their feminine aspect. They might want to do this by having a glass of wine, taking a bath, chatting with a friend, their mother, or their children, or downloading their husband on their day. Meanwhile, their husband might want to either get into, or stay in, his masculine aspect—this means that he wants to get “empty” or be quiet. And this becomes a source of disconnect and dissonance: As she “downloads” him on her day, he is craving silence—neither one of them is getting what they want or need.

“THIS BECOMES A SOURCE OF DISCONNECT AND DISSONANCE: AS SHE ‘DOWNLOADS’ HIM ON HER DAY, HE IS CRAVING SILENCE—NEITHER ONE OF THEM IS GETTING WHAT THEY WANT OR NEED.”

This is not to say that this can’t happen—the intimacy, the conversation. A few things need to happen first, though, in order to create the ideal tension rather than dislocation. First, understanding that this polarity needs some time to happen is essential, as it adds a filter of acceptance. Second, both parties need to own their individual aspects. What needs to happen to create ideal sexual tension (again, a non-issue if you just want to be buddies for the evening), is for the husband to direct the wife when she steps through the door to have a glass of wine, or a bath, or to go relax and change. He is directing her to get full. Women balk at this, but for sexual tension, it’s essential. There needs to be that separation—getting full and getting empty—before they can come together again fully charged.

WHAT’S FOR DINNER

For many reasons, the onus of making dinner is often on women, which feels unfair, particularly for women who work outside the home—after making decisions all day, I often hear that the last thing they want to do when they leave work is to figure out what to make, order, or book.

Think about the rules of dating, though, and it’s interesting that the onus of “taking charge” is on men. Women like it when a man plans a date, and directs the activities of the evening. It’s sexy. But as relationships carry on, more and more of this falls on women.

“FOR MANY WOMEN, THE IDEA OF COMING HOME FROM WORK AND BEING GREETED AT THE DOOR BY A SMILING, APRON-CLAD HUSBAND ACTUALLY FEELS DISCONCERTING—EVEN THOUGH THE IDEA OF A HUSBAND WHO MAKES DINNER IS VERY APPEALING.”

There was a fascinating study a few years ago that found that in marriages where men do more, or an equal amount of housework, the couple have less sex. Understandably, this study got a tremendous amount of pick-up, and many women felt like it undermined an equality that had been decades in the making. (My guess is that in marriages where there is a more equal split, there is greater friendship.) So here is the thing: This equality is a great thing, it’s just all in the framing. For many women, the idea of coming home from work and being greeted at the door by a smiling, apron-clad husband actually feels disconcerting—even though the idea of a husband who makes dinner is very appealing. However, with a subtle shift—coming home to a husband who directs you to have a glass of wine while he finishes up dinner prep suddenly sounds quite sexy. (Substitute in calling in an order, making a reservation, picking up take-out.) The direction—the assumption of the masculine aspect—is a subtle but essential necessity.

GIVING DIRECTIONS

Biologically, women are not inclined to have sex with a man they do not trust—and trust can mean many things. It can mean dishonesty, but it can also revolve around competency. I.e., a forgetful, unreliable man is not attractive. Interestingly, in my marriage, and in the marriages of many of my clients, guys are not as good at directions and navigating. This is a situation my husband and I would have all the time. I would know he was going the wrong way, would suggest he change course, and then be annoyed and turn away from him or I’d pick a fight. It was unattractive all around. Now we have a system in place that is empowering: It empowers me to ensure that we get to where we’re supposed to go, and it makes him not look or feel incompetent as a driver. It’s very simple: We get in the car, he turns to me, and he tells me to tell him where to go. He is directing me to direct him.