Peer Reviewed Scientists Debunk Man Made Climate Change At Conference In Paris Called “Day of Examining the Data”


Written by Justin Deschamps

There is little doubt that current state of human civilization is out of balance with nature. Industrialization has wreaked untold havoc on the environment, destroying ecosystems as a matter of course, all in the name of profit and control.

The emission of carbon dioxide into the air has over the past 20 years has been all be criminalized by the priesthood of science. Advertisements indoctrinate the masses into the new age belief that humanity is polluting the environment to such an extent that it is catastrophically changing the climate. While pandemic pollution of the environment can’t be ignored, the notion of man-made climate change is little more than a modern day myth, promulgated by a short-sighted scientific community and a despotic ruling elite. The recent Climate Change Conference in Paris sponsored by the United Nations, is receiving an enormous amount of media coverage, with talking heads on news outlets such as CNN and Fox news painting the picture that man-made climate change is an unquestionable reality.

While globalist leaders plotted to further their war on CO2 and human life at the UN conference, The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) and The Heartland Institute, an esteemed panel of peer reviewed scientists met in Paris on December 7th to present evidence that the theory of man-made climate change is implausible and unsupported by the full body of evidence available.

Here is the Press Release issued for the event:

The day-long program – called the “Day of Examining the Data” – will be held on Monday, December 7 in the San Francisco Room at the Hotel California, 16 Rue de Berri, 75008 Paris, France. The program begins with a press conference at 9:00 a.m., followed by panel presentations and a keynote luncheon address. Presenters will make the compelling case that an objective examination of the latest climate science shows humans are not causing a global warming crisis.

The event is open to the public. Credentialed media should RSVP by contacting Heartland Institute Director of Communications Jim Lakely at [email protected] or 312/731-9364.

The presentations of science and policy will be followed by the global “red carpet” premiere of the CFACT documentary Climate Hustle at 7:30 p.m. at Cinema du Pantheon, 13 Rue Victor Cousin, 75005 Paris.

“It must be declared once again: If the world actually faced a man-made climate catastrophe and we all had to rely on the United Nations to save us – we would all be doomed!” said Marc Morano of CFACT. “Thankfully, scientists and policy experts have exposed the alleged ‘consensus’ and the UN climate process as nothing more than politics disguised as science. The new film Climate Hustle is set to rock the climate debate.”

Four scientists are confirmed for the “Day of Examining the Data” event:
S. Fred Singer, Ph.D., a physicist, is president of the Science and Environmental Policy Project and founder of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). Read his full bio at this link.

“Climate is constantly changing; it has been warming and cooling for millions of years because of natural influences,” Singer said. “There is no reason to believe that these natural factors have suddenly stopped working – today or in the future. Therefore, the burden of proof is for climate alarmists to show convincing evidence that the rise of CO2 will produce catastrophes. In my view, they have not done this – probably because they cannot.”

Willie Soon, Ph.D., is an astrophysicist and geoscientist based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He is author ofThe Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection, as well as many articles published in peer-reviewed journals on the sun’s influence on climate. Read his full bio at this link.

“After a quarter of a century of dedication to the scientific research on how the sun can affect the earth’s climate, I am forced to conclude the United Nations’ summary of the latest science is either extremely weak or purposefully misleading filled with only half-truths,” Soon said. “I challenge all COP-21 participants and even Greenpeace to come hear us out and embrace the full truth and to stop the sad demonization of CO2, the ultimate gas of life.”

Robert M. Carter, Ph.D., a paleogeologist, is emeritus fellow of the Institute of Public Affairs in Australia and author of Climate Change: The Counter Consensus (London: Stacey International, 2010). Read his full bio at this link.

“In its first report in 1991, the IPCC concluded the observed twentieth century increase in global temperature could be largely due to natural variability. They were right then and the statement remains true today,” Carter said. “But despite the absence of direct evidence for dangerous human-caused warming, damaging natural climatic events will always be with us. The only sensible policy response is to prepare for and adapt to all hazardous climatic events, of whatever causation, as and when they occur.”

Christopher Essex, Ph.D., is a professor of applied mathematics at the University of Western Ontario and a former director of its program in theoretical physics. He is coauthor, with Ross McKitrick, of Taken by Storm. Read his full bio at this link.

“The world’s most baffling debate is over climate,” Essex said. “The debate’s boundaries exclude its own subject matter (the functions and differential equations of physics and chemistry). Within accepted boundaries, the key debating strategy for a certain side is to maintain throughout the debate that the debate is over, while simultaneously arguing its opponents do not exist, and that those nonexistent opponents are bad.”

The global press is calling COP-21 the last chance to convince the world’s governments to “solve” the global warming crisis. The contingent of climate realists – led by Heartland and CFACT – will be there to prove with globally accepted scientific data that there is no human-caused global warming crisis to solve.

For background on these arguments, watch presentations by some 200 scientists and policy experts at Heartland’s 10 International Conferences on Climate Change. Those who prefer to read can review the four volumes in the Climate Change Reconsidered series, produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) and published by The Heartland Institute.

Once an honest review of the data has been done, it is easy to see how the present state of climate on Earth is most likely a product of natural cycles. Additionally, the entire solar system has been experiencing planetary climate change, suggesting that solar activity is most likely the primary cause of changing weather patterns.
Finally, the advent of Geoengineering or Solar Radiation Management is a clandestine effort to alter natural weather patterns, amongst other things, which presently dumps countless tons of material into the atmosphere on a daily basis. Dane Wigington, a researcher, claims that the effects of what is commonly known as chemtrailing have had a huge impact on the Earth’s ecosystem and climate. According to Wigington, the problem of destabilization is much worse than what even the alarmist IPCC scientists claim.
Here is an interview with Pete Santilli of Dane Wigington:
In my view, the primary cause of climate change is solar, and relates to a natural process of changed energy states as the solar system moves through the galactic disk. According to the research, the solar system will continue to absorb energy from these more active regions of the galaxy until a type of quantum leap in solar activity occurs, which will profoundly affect life on Earth and in the solar system.

Taking all the data into consideration, it appears that the ruling elite are attempting to prevent this shift in energy from affecting the Earth, by spraying compounds that reflect or disrupt incoming energies. But as a result, the Earth is essentially being terraformed by the nanotechnology and compounds used in the Solar Radiation Management effort. But the research goes much further than that, suggesting geoengineering is a multi-pronged agenda with many different possible applications.

Related Chemtrails creating Cyber Humans?

Related How to Protect The Body Against AI Assimilation (Morgellons) | 6 Bodily Tissues That Can Be Regenerated Through Nutrition

But there is hope. These nefarious plans can only continue on their course if we acquiesce via our inaction. Spreading awareness and developing a personal understanding of these realities will help us work together to end this madness and restore the Earth back to health. It is my view, the role of our species is to act as custodians to the Earth, to use her resources wisely and for the benefit of all life. For humanity is the only species that we know of empowered with a mind capable of understanding the world, providing the basis for ethical and responsible cooperation with the environment.

Related How the Cabal Maintains Their Power And What You Need To Do To Stop It – Un-Consent | Beyond BRICS: Exposing the Rats

– Justin

SourceAnti Corruption Society


Sean Adl-Tabatabai,


The scientists say that while the science refutes the UN’s claim that man-made carbon emissions are to blame for global warming, they claim that the UN is pressing ahead with its sinister ‘climate regime’ agenda, which includes: destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy under the guise of regulating the immensely beneficial “gas of life,” also known as carbon dioxide. reports:

Dubbed “Day of Examining the Data,” the conference featured numerous presentations, each one debunking multiple elements of the increasingly discredited anthropogenic (man-made) global-warming theory (AGW). From explaining the myriad benefits of carbon dioxide to the environment and mankind to highlighting the ongoing 19-year pause in warming, no intellectually honest attendee could have left the summit still believing the “climate” hysteria pushed by various governments and international outfits. Indeed, practically every fear-mongering narrative pushed at the nearby UN climate summit was mercilessly debunked with facts, data, logic, and common sense. Later in the day, the film Climate Hustle brutally exposing the climate alarmism premiered at a nearby cinema in Paris, earning nothing but profuse praise from attendees.

Among the scientists speaking at the realist summit were Dr. Robert Carter, former chief of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University. “Global warming is not happening,” he explained, even noting that long-term cooling was predicted. Carter’s presentation was especially fascinating because it totally shredded the outlandish notion that CO2 — exhaled by humans and critical to life — is “carbon pollution” in need of regulation. In fact, he said, even at current atmospheric concentrations, the Earth and the plants it supports are “starving” for more CO2. And in the past, CO2 concentrations were some 10 to 15 times higher. “Attempting to stop climate change is an exercise in utter futility,” he added, noting in an interview with The New American that nobody would seriously consider trying to “stop” earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.

Also speaking at the summit was Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and geoscientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he explained, “is totally anti-science, and is harming science.” Emphasizing the massive role played by the sun in the Earth’s incomprehensibly complex climate system, Soon narrowed in on one particular claim in the IPCC report on the issue that he said made a complete mockery of science. “The IPCC is pure gangster science,” he explained. Speaking to The New American after his presentation, Soon said the vicious attacks against his character and family by global-warming alarmists had only motivated him to work harder. Rather than launching personal attacks, he said, critics should instead focus on the data and his conclusions published in the peer-reviewed literature.

Another top scientist at the summit was University of Virginia Professor Emeritus Dr. Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) and the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. “There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years,” he told the summit, showing a slide comparing observed temperatures with the various bogus predictions made by “climate models” relied upon by the UN, all of which predicted warming as CO2 increased. “The models don’t work. We should not use them to make policy.” He also noted that carbon dioxide — “the original plant food,” as he called it — is very valuable. “Plants are starving. They want more CO2,” Singer added.

Essentially, the internationally respected scientist continued, the climate has always changed due to natural forces — warming, cooling, and so on — from the beginning. And so, that means the obvious hypothesis that natural forces are still driving climate change, as they always have, must be shown to be false by proponents of the man-made climate change propaganda. In other words, the burden to show that the recent minor changes are attributable to mankind is on the alarmists who want to empower the UN, control CO2, and redistribute wealth. So far, though, the alarmists have failed, and they have a tough job ahead, Singer said.

“This is about money and power,” Singer told The New American in an interview, adding that governments had purchased the cooperation of many scientists on climate alarmism. “Science plays a small role, and mostly it’s being misused.” “It’s a matter of really trying to control things,” Singer said, noting that control of CO2 means control of economies and ultimately, people. What is being plotted right now at the nearby UN COP21 summit, he added, is a “direct subsidy to kleptocracies,” which are pocketing the climate loot and hiding it in their bank accounts. “It’s a matter of the poor in rich countries supporting the rich in the poor countries,” Singer concluded.

Also speaking at the summit was Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore, who gave a presentation thoroughly debunking the myth of “ocean acidification.” In the real world, he said, there is “no conceivable scenario” in which the world’s oceans would become acidic. “It is a complete fabrication with no basis in reality,” he said. In fact, CO2 does wonders for marine life, Dr. Moore showed, noting that the most productive area of the ocean, the Humboldt Current, is also the most “acidic.” “CO2 is fertilizing the oceans just like it is greening the Earth,” he said. In an interview with The New American after his presentation, Moore also identified the real agenda behind the UN climate summit: bringing down industrial civilization. If successful, he said, the lives of countless human beings will be lost as a result.

Dr. Christopher Essex, associated chair in the Department of Applied Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, also spoke at the summit, taking on various myths about the “climate” that are being peddled by politicians and “journalists” who he said have no clue what they are talking about. Trying to explain the unfathomably complex nature of the climate system, Essex said the whole “climate” conversation was absurd. One of his slides comically noted, “Over 95 percent of the models agree: The observations must be wrong.” Essex built his first climate model in the 1970s, and in an interview with The New American said that humanity still has a lot to learn about the climate system and that much more research is needed.

After the scientists gave their presentations, a panel discussion highlighted the massive damage being done — especially to the poor — by so called “climate” policies. Among those speaking was Lord Christopher Monckton, a giant in the climate realist movement. Climate alarmists have “the money, power, and glory, but we have the truth, so they have nothing, and we have everything.” If the UN summit succeeds in its goals, though, millions of people will die, he said. In an interview later with The New American, Monckton said the real agenda was to create a communist-fascist-style global government that would end self-government, prosperity, the middle class, and liberty. Another expert who spoke on the panel, Dr. Wolfgang Mueller with the European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE), also explained that what the developing world needs is not “climate reparations” or CO2 controls, but affordable energy.

Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment Committee, appeared at the summit via video link to provide encouragement to the realists. Noting that Americans are catching on to the climate-alarmism hoax, Senator Inhofe vowed that Congress and the American people would scuttle any pseudo-treaties negotiated by the Obama administration that may come out of the UN summit. “We already rejected [Obama’s] power plan, that’s done,” he said, speaking of Congress rejecting the centerpiece of what Inhofe called the administration’s “climate charade.” “You guys, here in this room, as you always have, just keep it up. Our progress would not have happened without you. You’re doing the Lord’s work, and we’re going to win this thing together.”

The summit was hosted by the Heartland Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. So far, despite the fact that thousands of “journalists” are in Paris covering the UN summit, virtually nothing has been reported by the press about the prestigious scientists and their conference. Also blacked out of the media has been the NIPCC report, in which scientists examined the peer-reviewed science and came to dramatically different conclusions from the UN IPCC. Heartland speakers noted that they often invite alarmist scientists to debate realists, but instead, the alarmist movement prefers to pretend that the “science is settled” rather than address the major holes in their theory. And at the latest summit, that was about as evident as it could be. Still, virtually everybody at the conference expressed hope that, eventually, truth and facts would prevail.




Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *